For two decades, the ABF Pan Asia Bond Index Fund (PAIF) has been underpinned by its straightforward access to Asia’s economic opportunities and the potential for attractive risk-adjusted returns. We explore why this is expected to continue in the years ahead.
The index-tracking features of the ABF Pan Asia Bond Index Fund (PAIF) provide investors with diverse exposure to local-currency bonds across eight ASEAN markets. The iBoxx ABF Pan-Asia Index is used by PAIF as an investment objective minus fees and expenses. The index has been designed to encompass the overall size of bond issuance and factors like liquidity, credit ratings, the regulatory, legal, and fiscal environment, as well as trading and clearing infrastructure in each market.1
Unsurprisingly, China’s population, geography, and economic strength result in its bond market being larger than the other seven economies in which PAIF invests. However, because any single market exposure is limited to 25% of the iBoxx ABF Pan-Asia Index, the position in China is also limited to 25% in PAIF. Following on, the most significant exposures are Singapore, South Korea, and Malaysia, while the smallest markets are Hong Kong and the Philippines, with around 8% and 6% index exposure, respectively.2
The International Monetary Fund anticipates an increase in intra-Asia activity if markets integrate more closely in terms of trade and financial environments.3 The recent tariff issues may also spur changes to supply chains and encourage markets to reorient their economies to reduce their reliance on exports.4 Increasing trade and investment across Asia Pacific may trigger more issuance and provide PAIF with a deeper and broader pool of bonds.
Markets across the region have historically used exports to lift per capita incomes. While this has worked well in the past, they recognise that a pivot towards consumption and services5 is needed to become more productive.
For instance, China is using various policy tools to increase domestic consumption.6 The government is cognisant that people are cautious about how much they spend, which could trigger a deflationary spiral. This reluctance reflects concerns about factors such as the property market's health, unemployment, and a weak social services safety net.7
Investors seeking regional exposure have a range of choices to consider. Buying equities is one option, but stocks and shares are generally considered riskier than bonds.8 Foreign-currency corporate bonds are another possibility, but given these are typically issued in US dollars or euros, they generally carry a higher level of risk than a local-currency bond.9 This is because governments that issue sovereign bonds can always print more of their national currencies, whereas issuers of foreign-currency-denominated bonds do not have this option. The issuer will have to repay the investor in the that particular currency, so the possibility of the investor not being repaid, while likely small, does remain. As such, corporate bonds are often viewed as riskier than government or quasi-government bonds in which PAIF invests.10
Looking at the eight PAIF markets, there is a wide difference in the predominant type of investor. In China, for example, these are banks, whereas in Thailand, pension and insurance funds prevail.11 A common factor, regardless of jurisdiction, is that investors tend to be long-term holders, meaning that short-term swings in sentiment should not trigger excessive volatility. This contrasts with overseas investors or short-term participants, who typically have a more limited holding time frame.
Overall, PAIF’s appeal is underpinned by the fact that investors can benefit from Asia’s economic opportunities in a straightforward transaction. Moreover, for two decades, the Fund’s investment approach has consistently delivered attractive returns with a relatively low level of risk.